|
Is That a Bomb In Your Pants, Joe Klein, Or Are You
Just Happy to See Barack Obama?
It's been suggested the real reason leftists oppose waterboarding
is that their intellectual corruption borders so closely on terrorist
activity they fear that once their motives and tactics have been exposed,
they themselves will be subjected to this very effective tactic for prying
information out of our enemies. The recently released Journolist e-mails
- capped off by member Joe Klein's embarrassing defense of the group's
activity - helps us understand why so many liberal journalists share this
fear.
And lest you recoil at the use of the word "terrorist"
in association with the Journolist group's activity, consider this suggestion,
from member Spencer Ackerman, to "take a rightwinger's [sic] and
smash it through a plate-glass window. Take a snapshot of the bleeding
mess and send it out in a Christmas card to let the right know that it
needs to live in a constant state of fear." Keeping its enemies in
precisely that "constant state of fear," worried about when
and where the next bloody attack is going to happen, is precisely what
terrorists aim to achieve. Add to this the strong sense that those on
the left seem to be, like their openly terrorist counterparts, conspiring
to dramatically weaken, if not overthrow, our country, and you begin to
understand the concern of many about Journolist.
To get back to Joe Klein's defense of JournoList: First,
Joe, let me recommend that you listen to The Jim Rome Show now and then.
As the sports talk show host says, "You can't gloss yourself."
Translation: It's not legitimate to give yourself a self-aggrandizing
nickname; nicknames have to be given to you by others. In other words,
you can't describe your journalistic confederates as "an oxymoronic
tribe of fierce individualists," especially when one of the words
you're looking for is "moronic" and the other is "lemmings."
The reason your liberal journalist associates are such a bunch of moronic
lemmings is not that you're "thrown into each other's company"
on press planes and buses; it's because none of you has ever had an original
idea in your life and you seek in the company of others reassurance that
the leftist claptrap you've been indoctrinated with is a valid political
philosophy when historically it's never been anything but an excuse for
genocide and incompetence.
To understand that, you have only to take a cursory look
at the damage the current economically illiterate administration, with
the help of equally clueless cheerleaders like many of your fellow Journolist
members, is in the process of doing. It's not about providing health care
for the masses, it's not about saving General Motors or too-big-to-fail
banks, and it's not about rescuing the planet from climatological catastrophe.
It's about amassing power and exerting dictatorial control
by a supposedly elite group (of which I sense you see yourself as a member)
over the very American people who have built the greatest nation in history,
and it's based on the notion that even after you dismantle our economic
engine by replacing free-market capitalism with an economy based on a
loose set of socialist principles and putting people with no real-world
experience in charge of it, somehow tens of trillions of dollars worth
of GDP will still miraculously be churned out annually and delivered to
you for distribution to the masses.
It's not likely to work that way. Already the first signs
are appearing that the hundreds of new bureaucratic components necessary
to implement, for instance, the healthcare bill are not simply going to
be unwieldy to administer, they're going to be impossible even to create.
The bill, written and passed with politburo-worthy single-party collusion
and secrecy, promises to add layers of compliance to administering a company
that promises to drive all but larger corporations out of business. The
true engines of economic growth, small businesses, are likely to go under
because of the costs of complying with new governmental mandates.
I know, you guys with a leftward list don't subscribe
to the notion of guilt by association, certainly not when you're defending
your presidential candidate against being attacked for having sat in church
with his family and absorbed the Reverend Jeremiah Wright's un-American
black liberation theology diatribes for upwards of 20 years. But your
insistence that there's nothing conspiratorial about getting together
and sharing your ideas about how to suppress that genuinely important
news and then successfully carrying out your strategy in order to help
salvage Obama's candidacy rings hollow. Denial is not defense, although
it may, as Elisabeth Kubler-Ross explained in On Death and Dying, be the
first stage in the process of coming to terms with your and your journalistic
confederates' imminent intellectual demise.
The Climategate conspirators used much the same approach
- the suppression and falsification of evidence - and much the same response
when discovered - downplay the importance of their collusion - when they
were caught stacking the deck in order to effect a massive transfer of
wealth from western democracies to Third World autocracies in the name
of saving the planet from a non-existent threat. There is, in the final
analysis, no defense for your tactics, which never seem to focus on truth
but always on outcomes.
Until we're able to once again achieve something resembling
the separation of press and state, until a semblance of journalistic integrity
is returned to your calling, the outing of Journolist members only serves
to heighten our mistrust of your profession. Your self-described incorporation
of "the accumulated wisdom of this list-serve community" into
your own work is, to my mind, an admission of guilt, welcome, of course,
but damning without an accompanying statement of repentance and a promise
to do better in the future. I don't care that you represent a political
point of view; I do care that you don't understand that your collusion
amounts to journalistic sabotage of the democratic process itself. |